Welcome to the Valensi Rose PLC Blog
To contact one of our attorneys please visit VRMLAW.COM

Showing posts with label mayer nazarian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mayer nazarian. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2013

California Franchise Tax Board Hot Audit Issues Part III

Recently, the California Franchise Tax Board announced the most common tax audit issues affecting Individuals, Pass-Through Entities and Corporations.  In the previous couple weeks we highlighted the first two taxpayer groups.

In this last installment, we will discuss the top issues for Corporate Taxpayers.

1. Sales Factor and Gross Receipts - Items included in the sales factor denominator that do not meet the definition of "gross receipts" or result in distortion.  (The sales factor denominator is the total sales everywhere during the taxable year.  Only sales derived from business activities are considered in the sales factor -- nonbusiness sales are excluded.)

2. Abusive Tax Shelters - Abusive tax shelters involving the creation of entities or deductions without economic substance or a business purpose that attempt to avoid state or federal tax.

3. Credits - Credits such as the Enterprise Zone and the Research and Development Credit not properly reported.

4. Cost of Performance and Sourcing of Intangible Sales - Utilization of market rules for assigning sales from intangibles and services when electing a single sales factor for apportioning business income to California.

Please contact our Tax and Wealth Planning attorneys for consultation or assistance in the identification, clarification or resolution of these issues. 
Contact Mayer Nazarian
Contact Geoffrey Weg

Friday, June 7, 2013

California Franchise Tax Board Hot Audit Issues Part II

As discussed in our previous post, the California Franchise Tax Board recently announced the most common tax audit issues affecting Individuals, Pass-Through Entities and Corporations.  Last week we highlighted personal income taxpayers.
 
This week, we will review the top issues for Pass-Through Entity Taxpayers.
 
1. Disposition of Real Estate - IRC Section 1031 and 1033 issues: specifically with respect to deferred gain, incorrect treatment of cancellation of debt (COD) income within short sales or deeds in lieu, and failure to report California-source income by nonresident taxpayers . 
 
2. Final Year of Limited Liability Companies (LLC) or Partnerships - In the final year of an LLC or Partnerships, verification of proper gains or losses, reconciliation of negative capital accounts, distributions of installment notes, and COD income.
 
3. Apportioning Trust Income - When trust income is from sources within and without California, the apportionment of income to California and the residency status of the trustee must be appropriate. (A trust will be subject to taxation in California if the fiduciary or a noncontingent beneficiary is a resident of California.)
 
4. Other State Tax Credits - Verification of taxes paid to the other states is another audit priority.
 
5. Shareholders Basis - Review of shareholder's basis to determine correct flow through income, losses, deductions, credits, as well as taxability of distributions, debt repayments, and dispositions.
 
6. Built-in Gains - The recognition period and the basis of the disposed asset must be properly reported.  (If an S corporation that was formerly a C corporation sells an appreciated asset (such as real estate) and the appreciation occurred during the time the corporation was a C corporation, the S corporation will probably pay C corporation taxes on the appreciation--even though the corporation is now an S corporation. This Built In Gain (BIG) tax rate is 35% on the appreciated property, but is only realized if the BIG asset is sold within 5 years (starting from the first day of the first tax year of conversion to S-Corp status.))

Please contact our Tax and Wealth Planning attorneys for consultation or assistance in the identification, clarification or resolution of these issues. 
 
Contact Geoffrey Weg 

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

California Franchise Tax Board Hot Audit Issues Part I

Mayer Nazarian
Geoffrey A. Weg
Recently, the California Franchise Tax Board announced the most common tax audit issues affecting Individuals, Pass-Through Entities and Corporations. 

Over the next few weeks we will briefly highlight these areas.
 
This week, we will discuss the top issues for Personal Income Taxpayers.
 

1. Like-Kind-Exchange Transactions - Sale of Property Through an IRC 1031 Exchange with incorrect treatment of boot, identification of property, and/or "drop and swap transactions.”
 
2. Securities Transactions - Overstated stock basis, unreported option premium income, and regulated futures contracts. 
 
3. Rental Real Estate Losses - The treatment of the real estate activity as passive or nonpassive may vary for Federal versus State tax purposes, therefore, the classification selected by the taxpayer must be appropriate. (Generally, losses from passive activities, including rental real estate, may be deducted only up to the amount of income from passive activities. Any excess loss is carried forward to the following year or years until the interest in the activity is disposed in a fully taxable transaction. In some cases, a taxpayer may classify rental activities as nonpassive for federal purposes. However, for California purposes rental activities are generally considered passive, with a few exceptions.) 
 
4. Residency - Residency status for state tax purposes is based upon the taxpayer's specific situation which includes consideration of where the taxpayer has the closest connections and whether or not he/she receives substantial benefits and protection from the state. 
Please contact our Tax and Wealth Planning attorneys for consultation or assistance in the identification, clarification or resolution of these issues. 

Part two will be published next week.

Contact Mayer Nazarian
Contact Geoffrey A. Weg

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

A recent US government report acknowledges that U.S.-based global companies are increasingly shifting profits into offshore tax havens

Mayer Nazarian
Geoffrey Weg
Among the findings: American multinational companies reported 43% of their overseas profits in the tax havens studied - Bermuda, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Switzerland - in 2008, the most recent year data was available. 
 
At the same time, these same companies hired only 4% of their foreign workforce and made just 7% of their foreign investments in these same countries.
 
"By all indicators examined in this report, profit shifting has generally trended upward over time," the report said.  The analysis found this trend increasing since 1999. 
 
U.S.-based corporations are paying among the steepest corporate tax rates of all industrialized countries.  The report acknowledged that the high U.S. tax rate gives an incentive for companies to move profits abroad, a finding likely to fuel debate over the taxes corporations pay and their flexibility in locating profits.
 
The Congressional Research Service (“CRS”), a nonpartisan research arm of Congress used by lawmakers, analyzed profit data from multinational companies and compared reported profits and other business activity in lower-tax jurisdictions versus higher-tax countries like the United Kingdom and Canada.  The data were compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, a unit of the Commerce Department that collects economic data from non-financial companies with foreign affiliates.
 
The Tax & Wealth Planning Group at Valensi Rose, PLC is experienced in advising and helping clients create tax efficient strategies for domestic and offshore business activities.
Contact; Geoffrey Weg   
Contact: Mayer Nazarian

Thursday, October 25, 2012

2012 Year-End Tax Planning Tips

Year-end planning is a bigger challenge this year than in past years because, unless Congress acts, tax rates will go up next year, many more individuals will be snared by the alternative minimum tax (AMT), and various deductions and other tax breaks will be unavailable. To be more specific, as a result of expiring Bush-era tax cuts, unless Congress ascts, individuals will face higher tax rates next year on their income, including capital gains and dividends, and estate tax rates will be higher as well. The AMT problem arises because, for 2012, AMT exemptions have dropped and fewer personal credits can be used to offset the AMT. Additionally, a number of other tax provisions expired at the end of 2011 or will expire at the end of 2012. Rules that expired at the end of 2011 include, for example, the research credit for businesses, the election to take an itemized deduction for State and local general sales taxes instead of the itemized deduction permitted for State and local income taxes, and the above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition expenses. Rules that will expire at the end of this year include generous bonus depreciation allowances and expensing allowances for business, and expanded tax credits for higher education costs.

These adverse tax consequences are by no means a certainty. Congress could extend the Bush-era tax cuts for some or all taxpayers, retroactively "patch" the AMT for 2012 to increase exemptions and availability of credits, revive some favorable tax rules that have expired, and extend those that are slated to expire at the end of this year. Which actions Congress will take remains to seen and may well depend on the outcome of the elections. While these uncertainties make year-end tax planning more challenging than in prior years, they should not be an excuse for inaction. Indeed, the almost certain prospect of some higher taxes next year makes it even more important to engage in year-end planning this year. To that end, we have compiled a checklist of actions that may help you save tax dollars if you act before year-end. Many of these moves may benefit you regardless of what Congress does on the major tax questions of the day. Not all actions will apply in your particular situation.

We can narrow down the specific actions that you can take once we meet with you to tailor a particular plan. In the meantime, please review the following list and contact us at your earliest convenience so that we can advise you on which tax-saving moves to make. We also should schedule a follow-up for later this year to see whether the November election results will require changes to year-end planning strategies.

 Year-End Tax Planning Moves for Individuals  

  (1)   Realize losses on stock while substantially preserving your investment position. There are several ways this can be done. For example, you can sell the original holding, then buy back the same securities at least 31 days later. It would be advisable for us to meet to discuss year-end trades you should consider making. 


(2)   If you are thinking of selling assets that are likely to yield large gains, such as inherited, valuable stock, or a vacation home in a desirable resort area, try to make the sale before year-end, with due regard for market conditions. This year, long-term capital gains are taxed at a maximum rate of 15%, but the rate could well be higher next year as noted above. And if your adjusted gross income (as specially modified) exceeds certain limits ($250,000 for joint filers or surviving spouses, $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 for all others), gains taken next year (along with other types of unearned income, such as dividends and interest) will be exposed to an extra 3.8% tax (the so-called "unearned income Medicare contribution tax").


(3)   Make gifts sheltered by the annual gift tax exclusion before the end of the year and thereby save gift and estate taxes.You can give $13,000 in 2012 to each of an unlimited number of individuals but you can't carry over unused exclusions from one year to the next. The transfers also may save family income taxes where income-earning property is given to family members in lower income tax brackets who are not subject to the kiddie tax. Savings for next year could be even greater if rates go up and/or the income from the transfer would have been subject to the 3.8% tax in the hands of the donor.

 Year-End Moves for Business Owners

(1)   If your business is incorporated, consider taking money out of the business by way of a stock redemption if you are in the position to do so. The buy-back of the stock may yield long-term capital gain or a dividend, depending on a variety of factors. But either way, you'll be taxed at a maximum rate of only 15% if you act this year. If you wait until next year to make your move, your long-term gains or dividends may be taxed at a higher rate if reform plans are instituted or the Bush-era tax cuts expire. And if your adjusted gross income (as specially modified) exceeds certain limits ($250,000 for joint filers or surviving spouses, $125,000 for a married individual filing a separate return, and $200,000 for all others), gains taken next year (along with other types of unearned income, such as dividends and interest) will be exposed to an extra 3.8% tax (the so-called "unearned income Medicare contribution tax"). Keep in mind that you will need expert help to plan and execute an effective pre-2013 corporate distribution.
  
(2)   Set up a self-employed retirement plan if you are self-employed and haven't done so yet. 

(3)   Increase your basis in a partnership or S corporation if doing so will enable you to deduct a loss from it for this year. A partner's share of partnership losses is deductible only to the extent of his partnership basis as of the end of the partnership year in which the loss occurs. An S corporation shareholder can deduct his pro rata share of an S corporation's losses only to the extent of the total of his basis in (a) his S corporation stock, and (b) debt owed to him by the S corporation.
 
These are just some of the year-end steps that can be taken to save taxes. Again, by contacting us, we can tailor a particular plan that will work best for you.  Please contact a member of the Tax & Wealth Planning Group for more information.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Fleeced Madoff Ponzi Investors Receive Partial Payments on Initial Investments

Geoffrey Weg
Mayer Nazarian
On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Irving H. Picard, Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”) Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("BLMIS")(the “Trustee”) announced that checks for the second pro rata interim distribution to eligible account holders totaling $2.5 billion were mailed on Wednesday, September 19, 2012. This second distribution, when combined with the funds already returned to account holders, fully satisfies more than 50 percent of the total current accounts with allowed claims.
 
The Trustee also reported the following: 
  • 1,230 accounts will receive approximately 1/3rd of the allowed claim amount;
  • The average payment will be slightly more than $2 million;
  • Of these 1,230 accounts, previously 892 were fully satisfied; an additional 182 accounts will be fully satisfied by this second distribution;
  • A total of $3.625 billion has been returned to account holders;
  • The Trustee has recovered or reached agreements to recover more than 50% of the approximately $17.3 billion lost by claimants.  
“In addition to recovering as much stolen money as possible for Madoff’s victims, we are also moving forward aggressively to resolve litigation and appeals which are delaying further distributions to BLMIS customers,” said David J. Sheehan, Chief Counsel to the SIPA Trustee. “We are confident in our positions and we look forward to putting more recovered funds back in the hands of their rightful owners in the near future.”
 
Amounts not recovered by claimants may be claimed as a theft loss deduction on the taxpayer’s federal income tax return, which may offset other income and result in a tax refund. For taxpayers who suffered similar losses from investment fraud, IRS offers tax relief in Revenue Procedure 2009-20 (the “Revenue Procedure”). The Revenue Procedure provides that investors may deduct up to 95% of the investment loss, less any actual recovery and any potential recovery from SIPC or other insurance claim. The investor may have to report income or an additional deduction in future years depending on any actual recovery.
 
For more information, contact Mayer Nazarian or Geoffrey A. Weg
Tax & Wealth Planning Group.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Attorney Mayer Nazarian Joins Valensi Rose

We are pleased to announce the addition of tax attorney Mayer Nazarian to our Tax and Wealth Planning practice group. 
 
Mayer Nazarian is a transactional tax attorney distinctively trained within top regional and national tax firms. Mayer capitalizes on his depth and breadth of business and taxation expertise when advising and advocating for his clients and providing planning, research and consultation services. Mayer has successfully represented his clients and negotiated on their behalf before the Internal Revenue Service, the California Franchise Tax Board, the California State Board of Equalization and other taxing authorities.


In addition to his law degree, Mayer earned a Master of Business Taxation degree from the University of Southern California. He established a practical foundation as a tax professional with the accounting firm of Holthouse, Carlin and Van Trigt, LLP and then as a tax manager with Deloitte Tax, LLP.  Mayer went on to become the founder and managing principal of a law firm in Los Angeles, the Nazarian Law and Tax Group, Inc.

Contact Mayer Nazarian