Welcome to the Valensi Rose PLC Blog
To contact one of our attorneys please visit VRMLAW.COM

Showing posts with label Gary F. Torrell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gary F. Torrell. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Lenders Must Enforce Remedies "By the Book" or Suffer the Consequences

Gary F. Torrell
In a new California appellate court decision published this week called Bank of New York Mellon v. Preciado, the bank foreclosed on the borrower's home pledged as security for the loan and then sought to evict the former owners.  According to the decision, the bank made several mistakes along the way, including: (1) failure to provide proof the trustee who conducted the foreclosure sale had been properly substituted in place of the trustee named in the deed of trust; (2) the unlawful detainer complaint and judgment for possession incorrectly described the property as being located in San Jose instead of Alviso, California; and (3) the three-day notice to quit required before filing an unlawful detainer action was not properly served.  As a result, the appellate court reversed the trial court's ruling in favor of the bank, which allowed the former owners to remain in the property (presumably rent free and mortgage free) since July 2011, when the bank acquired title to the property.

This case proves how lenders must comply "by the book" with California's non-judicial foreclosure and eviction statutes when dealing with a borrower who fails to repay the loan and attempts to retain possession of the residential property after foreclosure.  Many lenders leave the duties associated with loan defaults and remedies to lower level, non-attorney employees who may lack the knowledge or experience to ensure the title company conducting the foreclosure and third parties conducting an eviction strictly comply with California law.  California courts can be harsh on such lenders, as this case shows.

Contact: Gary F. Torrell

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Gary Torrell to Speak on Tax Law and Bankruptcy at the Beverly Hills Bar Association

Attorney Gary F. Torrell of Valensi Rose PLC will speak on “How Tax Law Affects Bankruptcy” at the Beverly Hills Bar Association luncheon on July 25 at the Association’s office in Beverly Hills, California. Mr. Torrell is a partner at Valensi Rose and has over twenty-five years of legal and business experience working with high-net worth individuals and sophisticated companies.
                                                                         
The  luncheon program is designed to provide a brief overview of the three most common types of bankruptcy cases filed by individuals and businesses, Chapters 7, 11 and 13.  Mr. Torrell is joined by co-speaker David M. Agler of Crowe Horwath LLP.  They will cover certain tax and related issues that arise frequently in bankruptcy cases, and tax planning  associated with bankruptcy.

Mr. Torrell’s expertise includes managing complex, nationwide commercial real-estate restructurings and bankruptcies for institutional lenders and private equity firms.  He has handled a wide spectrum of properties including hotels, office buildings, apartments, condominiums, resorts, residential developments and other properties.  

Mr. Torrell is a  Bankruptcy Court mediator and  represents secured and unsecured creditors, including major banks and landlords, in various bankruptcy cases throughout the United States.  

The Beverly Hills Bar Association is located at 9420 Wilshire Boulevard in Beverly Hills, California.  The event provides two hours of Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of California.

Contact Gary Torrell

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Gary F. Torrell's Article "Winning Strategies For Resolving Consumer Complaints" Published in The Corporate Counselor

Gary F. Torrell was recently published in the Summer 2011 edition of "The Coporate Counselor," a publication for in-house counsel provided by The Corporate Law Departments Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association. Gary was invited to write the keystone article for the Summer issue because of his background as in-house counsel for several corporations.

Gary’s article, entitled "Winning Strategies For Resolving Consumer Complaints," discusses the challenges of defending a corporation against a single or small group of consumers. The article also gives some valuable tips and tricks to assist in-house counsel with navigating the delicacies of defending their company against consumer complaints.

To the full article...

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Gary Torrell To Give Lecture at Santa Clara Law School on Physician Leases

Gary Torrell will be a guest lecturer at the Santa Clara University School of Law in Northern California on February 15, 2011, to discuss the tension between commercial realities and federal law when a hospital is the landlord in medical office buildings leased to physicians.
Gary is the guest of the vice president and general counsel from one of Valensi Rose’s largest and valued nonprofit healthcare clients. Gary was invited to share his expertise on leasing with students who are taking a course in Health Law.
Founded in 1911, Santa Clara University School of Law is one of the nation’s most diverse law schools. They offer graduate degrees in international law and intellectual property law and certificates in intellectual property law, international law, and public interest and social justice law.

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

PRESS RELEASE: Gary Torrell Wins La Toya Jackson Royalty Dispute

Valensi Rose, PLC partner Gary F. Torrell prevailed on behalf of his client La Toya Jackson by successfully opposing a trustee's motion to obtain additional royalties due to the internationally renowned entertainer.

Mr. Torrell said, "This was a very challenging case, to convince a judge in New York that Ms. Jackson's creditors should not obtain additional royalties, even though they had not received any payment. Luckily, the judge agreed with my arguments and issued a well-reasoned opinion in favor of our valued client."

A written trust agreement allowed the trustee to collect Ms. Jackson's royalties for a specified time period, pay the priority claims of the trustee and his lawyers, and then distribute the balance to certain creditors. Because the priority claims exceeded $780,000, they were expected to consume nearly all of the royalties collected during the term of the creditor trust. As a result, the trustee filed a motion seeking to extend the term for an additional five years and thereby obtain additional royalties for the benefit of creditors.

On August 5, 2010, the Honorable James M. Peck issued a published opinion denying the motion. The court agreed with Mr. Torrell's argument that it would be unfair and inequitable to Ms. Jackson to grant the motion, despite no distributions to creditors, because Ms. Jackson had honored the trust agreement and was not responsible for the trustee's high fees, which had consumed the allocated royalties.

The judge also interpreted the trust agreement to not permit an extension of the term to allow creditors to obtain additional royalties otherwise due to Ms. Jackson.

Contact Gary Torrell...

Thursday, March 4, 2010

How To Succeed With In-House Counsel

By Gary F. Torrell
Valensi Rose, PLC
After serving as temporary in-house counsel (IHC) to a client in 1990, I published an article entitled “How to Work With In-House Counsel.” Since then, I have been general counsel at a publicly-owned financial institution and a privately-owned real estate company and developed the following guidelines based on my experience as both IHC and outside counsel. The guidelines may seem unremarkable, but following them will increase your chances of obtaining business from (and developing strong bonds with) IHC and their companies. As with most everything in the law, there are exceptions to every guideline below, and you must always tailor your service to the wants and needs of the particular client and matter.
1. Getting Retained. Most IHC (and their companies) already have a full compliment of outside counsel to contact for new matters. To break in with them, you need a hook to distinguish you and your law firm from other law firms soliciting IHC for business -- e.g. being referred to IHC, promoting specific lawyers (by name) at your law firm with necessary expertise, offering a fee discount, or some other incentive. Money is a huge incentive, but not at the expense of high quality services. As general counsel, I regularly retained lawyers with big-firm training who charged lower rates at their present (smaller) law firm. If your law firm’s regular hourly rates are low compared to national law firms or other lawyers with similar credentials, sell this feature. Consider offering a discount for the initial matter or for an initial time period, to give IHC an obvious reason to try you. Diversity can also be an asset: Advertise and promote the minority lawyers employed at your law firm – this may be an important criteria to IHC. If you simply ask for business because you provide quality lawyers, competitive rates and good service, chances are your solicitation will go in IHC’s round file.
2. Your First Matter. Congratulations – you’ve been retained! The next step is to ask for and review all of IHC’s policies and procedures (written and unwritten), and then share them within your law firm and follow them to the letter. The point is to recognize that IHC is in control of the relationship, so ask how and when IHC prefers you communicate with them and accommodate IHC’s preferences. Do not speak directly with others at the company without IHC’s permission (unless it’s an emergency). When permitted to communicate with others at the company, copy IHC on all written/electronic communications; it’s more than a courtesy, it keeps IHC where they should be—the number one spot.
3. Get Noticed For the Right Reasons. IHC knows the client, the goals in the matter, the budget concerns, the internal politics and the other important considerations. As outside counsel, you should talk less and listen more, especially on your first matter. Let IHC interrupt you and ask questions; they are not hiring you to hear speeches. Encourage IHC to ask questions and ask for their opinion on substantive decisions. Treat them as you would want to be treated as co-counsel. Be humble when asked about your experience; give examples, but undersell. Be cost conscious--ask before you charge substantial fees or incur substantial costs. Try to offer ways to reduce the legal expenses and behave as if you were paying (rather than collecting) the fees and costs being charged.
4. Give Substantive Advice and Be Accessible. If IHC leaves a substantive question on your voicemail, give a substantive response in your return voicemail/e-mail and don’t just say “returning your call.” Give IHC choices on possible legal strategies, but recommend your top choice and justify it. Then, if/when IHC (or the company) chooses a different direction, support the client’s choice. Do not direct – suggest, and always solicit IHC for suggested strategy. When IHC asks about your availability later that day or in the next few days, tell IHC when you are available, rather than what you’re doing that prevents you from being available – IHC didn’t ask for that and doesn’t really care (sorry). Give IHC ample advance notice of your planned absences/unavailability and remind IHC as the dates approach. Return all calls/e-mails promptly. If you cannot, have your assistant promptly return the call/e-mail and politely explain when you will be available again.
5. Predicting Results, Fees and Costs. Often IHC will request a budget from outside counsel for the matter and, in a disputed matter, your opinion on the likelihood of success. (As general counsel, I had a third question for outside counsel: the likelihood of recovery of legal expenses as the prevailing party.) At the outset of a new matter, outside counsel often underestimate the fees/costs and overestimate the likelihood of success. Be conservative on predicting results and on the high side in estimating legal fees; then strive to obtain a better result and charge lower fees than estimated. It is also essential to update all estimates as the matter progresses, to avoid surprises and offer a meaningful option for IHC to change direction midstream, before the fees and costs have gone too high.
6. Meet or Exceed Time Deadlines. The following should be familiar for those of you who have had regular, recurring meetings (business or pleasure) with the same group of people: Certain (few) attendees are almost always early, most are on time or slightly tardy and some are almost always late. Most lawyers (IHC and outside counsel) promise and endeavor to provide prompt service, but often deliver/show up late. To distinguish yourself from many outside counsel, you must accept IHC’s tardiness yet be on time (or early) for meetings. The same goes for providing legal advice and draft documents to IHC. In litigation matters, my rule of thumb is to get a polished (not rough) draft of pleadings to IHC at least a few business days before the filing deadline (earlier for dispositive pleadings), then request substantive input from IHC on the pleadings. To reduce costs, ask whether IHC wants to use company resources to respond to discovery requests, especially gathering documents. Remind IHC as deadlines approach, rather than telling IHC only once about the deadline.
7. Promptly Send Clear Billing Statements. Outside counsel’s billing statements should follow the same general guidelines for good legal writing: They should be clear, concise, descriptive and complete. Many companies now have billing guidelines or requirements; follow them to the letter. Also, a person unfamiliar with your matter may review the invoice, sometimes years later, so it should contain enough information for a stranger to understand what you did for the time charged. Make it easy on IHC to see the total time and billing rate charged for each timekeeper. Describe and itemize the costs in easily understood terms. When you write off time or do not charge for certain services, show that on your invoice (when appropriate) so IHC realizes this benefit you provided. When IHC questions you about the invoice, promptly respond and resolve all doubts in favor of IHC, lest you win the battle but lose future business. Try to get your monthly invoice to IHC within 20 days after the end of the month; you can create problems for IHC (and for payment) with tardy, incomplete or inaccurate billings.
8. Other Important Services. Give credit to IHC for successes, especially in front of IHC’s client and superiors. Offer free services – seminars, etc. Send new published cases and articles of interest to IHC (about relevant legal issues, the company, the industry in general, competitors, etc.). When asked by IHC for a lawyer referral, it’s fine to recommend another lawyer in your law firm (or yourself) if the person has the expertise, but recommend the right lawyer, even if that lawyer is outside your firm. Give practical advice. Suggest IHC and/or outside counsel get involved in any actual or potential dispute early on, to help develop better facts in the event the dispute goes to litigation. Finally, try to be positive and upbeat in conversations and other communications with IHC.

About Gary F. Torrell:

Gary’s career spans over twenty-four years of solid legal and business experience working with extremely sophisticated clients, companies and firms. He spent the first seventeen years of his career working in the Los Angeles area with such notable law firms as Paul, Hastings and Brobeck, Phelger & Harrison, where he honed his legal skills and developed savvy business insight handling creditors’ rights and bankruptcy cases. In 2000, Gary changed the focus of his career to become in-house counsel to several major corporations, including holding the Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary titles for Downey Financial Corporation, a $16 billion, NYSE traded company that had over 2,500 employees. Gary Torrell’s role as a partner at Valensi Rose brings his practical business thinking and problem solving approach to their clients. Gary helps continue the Valensi Rose tradition of providing clients the highest level of business and legal advice, structured to keep fees and costs in check without sacrificing results.
###